ANSWER:  GEORGE LATIMER.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

That’s right… George Latimer.

Everyone knows that Westchester has among the highest property taxes in the entire nation.

And George Latimer is a big reason why.

In fact, George Latimer has raised property taxes by more than any other person running for office in Westchester County this Fall.

Here’s why…

• He voted against the property tax cap.
• He voted for the MTA payroll Tax.
• He missed a key vote to provide relief from mandates, a key cause of high property taxes.
• He failed to deliver our fair share of school aid, making local taxpayers pick up the tab.
• He helped repeal the New Rochelle City Property Tax Cap.
• As County Legislator, he voted to hike county property taxes by 46% or $151 million.
• He also voted to increase county spending by 63% or $580 million.

When our public officials run for office, we expect them to run on their records.

And in this case, the record is clear:  George Latimer has raised property taxes by more than anyone else running for office in Westchester County!

Obviously, George Latimer is hoping that Westchester voters have short memories.  This on-line update is designed to make sure that no one forgets his failed record on property taxes.

__________________________________________

GEORGE LATIMER:

VOTED AGAINST GOVERNOR CUOMO’S PROPERTY TAX CAP

• The signature achievement of Governor Andrew Cuomo’s first year in office was the landmark 2% Property Tax Cap that was signed into law in 2011.
• While the tax cap hasn’t solved the entire property tax problem, it is already proving beneficial to millions of taxpayers across the state.
• In fact, compared to the ten year average, the property tax cap has already saved Westchester school property taxpayers nearly $64 million over the past year alone.
• But the most amazing thing about the tax cap is this:  George Latimer actually voted against it. (Ch.97 of the Laws of 2011)
• That’s right… the Assemblyman representing the region with some of the highest property taxes in the entire nation voted against the tax cap.
• George Latimer turned his back on the Governor, and completely dismissed the pleas of hardworking Westchester homeowners who are struggling to make ends meet.

There’s a reason you’re paying the highest property taxes in the nation…

His name is George Latimer.

__________________________________________

GEORGE LATIMER:

SKIPPING A VOTE & HURTING TAXPAYERS – Pension Reform

• In 2012, Governor Andrew Cuomo showed real leadership by announcing that he would seek to enact major new Public Pension reforms that would help deliver real mandate relief and tax savings to millions of New Yorkers.
• The Governor felt so strongly about it that he reached out to both Democrats & Republicans for support.
• And the Governor made a very clear public case that high public pension costs were damaging our economy, bankrupting local governments, and hurting overburdened property taxpayers.
• George Latimer ignored the Governor’s call for support.
• In fact, he skipped out on this crucial mandate relief vote entirely – turning his back on the Governor, and delivering a slap in the face to Westchester County taxpayers. ^{(s.6735 – 3/15/12)}
• Latimer didn’t want to take a tough vote, even though the new pension reforms would save Westchester taxpayers money.
• How much money?  A total of $75.4 million in savings for Westchester taxpayers over the next 5 years alone!

At a time when local middle class families in Westchester are struggling to make ends meet…
At a time when mandate relief is desperately needed…
At a time when Westchester property taxes are among the highest in the nation…
At a time when our Governor needs strong partners to help him tackle tough issues… George Latimer was nowhere to be found.

There’s a reason you’re paying the highest property taxes in the nation…

His name is George Latimer.

__________________________________________

GEORGE LATIMER:

SHORTCHANGING OUR KIDS — AND PROPERTY TAXPAYERS

• When Albany shortchanges us on school aid, our Westchester schools get hurt, our kids are cheated and local homeowners get hit with higher taxes.  We also pay higher property taxes.
• Under George Latimer, Westchester has gotten shortchanged on school aid – one of the big reasons we have among the highest property taxes in the nation.  
• In this year’s state budget, for example, Westchester schools only get $3,915 per pupil, far below the statewide average of $7,388 per pupil.
• In other words, our kids get $3,473 less in state aid than the statewide average.
• If we were to receive our fair share – meaning the statewide average – we’d be getting $507 million more in school aid… in this year alone.  Since 2005, when Latimer first took office, the cumulative gap between Westchester Co. and the statewide average is now $3.8 billion.
• The numbers make clear that George Latimer isn’t getting  the job done:

Westchester gets 9 cents for every dollar spent on education.  That’s the lowest in the state!

The statewide average is 40 cents!

$3.8 billion – That’s the amount Westchester schools have lost by not receiving our fair share of state aid from Albany since Latimer was first elected.

$48.3 million – That’s the amount Latimer voted to CUT state school aid to Westchester County by — $48.3 million! (Ch. 53 of the Laws of 2010)

• The bottom line is that George Latimer has failed to deliver our fair share of funding for our schools – costing Westchester property taxpayers millions, and diverting much-needed resources away from children’s education.

There’s a reason you’re paying the highest property taxes in the nation…

 His name is George Latimer.

__________________________________________________

GEORGE LATIMER: 

LATIMER’S MTA PAYROLL TAX – “This is for the greater good…”

• Hardworking taxpayers throughout Westchester were directly impacted by George Latimer’s vote to impose the notorious MTA payroll tax.
• His vote was also a disaster for our local economy and for the thousands of small businesses that were hit with this job killing tax!
• Latimer said “this is for the greater good of the whole state” when he voted to impose this tax on his own constituents.
• Latimer’s MTA tax hit Westchester citizens with $104.3 million in new taxes. 
• And that $104 million only represents one part of the tax — and doesn’t include all of the related license and registration fees that he also voted to approve:

634,821 Westchester drivers also now face higher license fees. ($2.4 M impact.)

Vehicle registration costs also went up, impacting 649,406 vehicles in Westchester — according to 2011 data. (Approximately $14.5 million impact.)

Overall, a typical Hudson Valley family was hit with $692 in higher costs.

• George Latimer is now taking credit for rolling back this tax.  That’s not just galling… it’s outrageous — since he personally imposed the tax to begin with!
• It’s even more outrageous because even after the rollback, local taxpayers still face $78.7 million in higher costs due to the remnants of the MTA mobility tax still in place, and Westchester drivers are still saddled with his higher license and registration fees!
• The bottom line is that when it came time for George Latimer to stand up for local taxpayers and small businesses — he didn’t.

There’s a reason you’re paying the highest property taxes in the nation…

 His name is George Latimer.

___________________________

GEORGE LATIMER:

A TAX-AND-SPEND COUNTY LEGISLATOR

• Before joining the Assembly, George Latimer was as a County Legislator.
• And his record of being a reckless tax-and-spend politician was just as clear back then as it is today.
• As County Legislator, Latimer raised county property taxes by a whopping 46%.
• That’s a total of $151 million in higher property taxes for you and me. (Westchester Co. Budgets 1993-2005)
• Latimer also voted to send county spending skyrocketing by 63%.
• That 63% translates into an additional $580 million of our money being spent. (Westchester Co. Budgets 1993-2005)

There’s a reason you’re paying the highest property taxes in the nation…

 His name is George Latimer.

___________________________

Scroll Down to See the George Latimer Taxpayer Report Card

__________________________________________

GEORGE LATIMER:

While Westchester Taxpayers criticized Senator Oppenheimer for missing the 2008 vote on a state property tax cap and voting for billions of dollars in higher state taxes and spending in 2009 and 2010, at least Senator Oppenheimer ultimately voted for Governor Cuomo’s property tax cap last year.

In contrast, Assemblyman Latimer voted against Governor Cuomo’s property tax cap in 2011 and, before that, eliminated the New Rochelle property tax cap in 2005.  For Westchester Taxpayers in New Rochelle, Assemblyman Latimer’s efforts to eliminate the New Rochelle property tax cap were coupled with an increase in the local sales tax.

Thanks to Assemblyman George Latimer, Westchester Taxpayers in New Rochelle have paid $4 million more in property taxes than they would have paid if he had not eliminated the cap and pay $9 million per year in higher local sales taxes.

According to a May 2003 article in the New York Times, “New Rochelle’s tax cap was put into effect in 1993, and prohibits city taxes from being raised more than the consumer price index. The cap was imposed in exchange for a 1 percent increase in sales tax, which brings in about $9 million a year.”  In June 2005, the Journal News noted that “[t]he restriction was the idea of former Assemblyman Ronald Tocci, who continually insisted that the city agree to the restriction in exchange for his needed support for the extra sales tax.”

The New Rochelle property tax cap was eliminated by legislation that the Journal News (June 2005) reported was “introduced at Latimer’s request.”

For Westchester Taxpayers, Assemblyman Latimer’s vote against Governor Cuomo’s property tax cap wasn’t a surprise.  His record clearly indicates that he’s opposed to capping property taxes, even in the nation’s highest taxed county.

New Rochelle – The cap that has limited property-tax increases for more than a decade moved closer than ever to being lifted completely last night after freshman state Assemblyman George Latimer came out against it.

The Rye Democrat, whose district covers much of New Rochelle, announced last night that he would support lifting the cap, which ties property-tax increases to the consumer price index, while still allowing New Rochelle to collect an extra penny-per-dollar sales tax.

A bill to make that happen, introduced at Latimer’s request, is expected to be voted on by the end of the legislative session tomorrow.

Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, whose district includes the rest of New Rochelle said she would vote against the bill, but even she predicted it would pass.

“I don’t believe the measure will be defeated,” she said. A defeat of the bill would cost New Rochelle an additional sales-tax source that brought in $9 million last year.

Paulin had introduced another bill that would have allowed the sales tax to continue and would have kept the property-tax cap in place, but would have greatly modified it, exempting the costs of police, fire protection and sanitation services from the limit. That bill – with a matching Senate bill from Sen. Jeff Klein, D-Bronx – could not come to a vote by the legislature, because it would require a formal request, or home-rule request, from the New Rochelle City Council.

The council previously had sent a home-rule request supporting Latimer’s bill and corresponding Senate bill sponsored by Sen. Suzi Oppenheimer, D-Mamaroneck.

“Absent a clear and present fiscal crisis … it is inappropriate for one level of government to impose this constraint on another level of government,” Latimer said in a page-long, single-spaced statement read to the New Rochelle City Council last night by Latimer’s chief of staff Deborah Chapin.

Mayor Timothy Idoni was encouraged by Latimer’s decision.

“We are very pleased with his action,” Idoni said, adding that he hoped the cap could be lifted “and the city can move on with its business.”

Latimer said he made his decision as he voted for bills allowing other counties and communities around the state to continue collecting similar extra sales tax. None of those communities was required to accept a property-tax cap, even though local newspapers showed that there were controversies in those areas about how local officials spent money.

Supporters of the tax cap said it was effective taxpayer protection against a local government that poorly managed the city.  Idoni and City Council members who opposed the cap had long defended their running of the city, and said the city should be able to set its own tax rate without interference from Albany.

Paulin said she stood by the idea that she and Klein supported.

“I still believe that a compromise is better for the city and better for taxpayers,” she said.

Klein, arguing that his bill protected taxpayers, said he would vote against Oppenheimer’s bill, even though a defeat of the bill would cost New Rochelle millions of dollars a year, much of which probably would have to be made up with higher property taxes.

Councilman Michael Boyle, the only council member to support the cap, said he was disappointed by Latimer’s decision.

“I believe he is turning his back on the overwhelming number of taxpayers in his district who support the tax cap,” he said.

Boyle said he would not have favored Paulin’s and Klein’s bills either, because the essentially left no protection for taxpayers.

New Rochelle – I would like to thank Assemblyman George Latimer for turning his back on the middle- and working-class families as well as the senior citizens of his district in New Rochelle. His vote to life the tax-cap protection on city taxes was very disappointing. Further disillusioning was his political machination to hide from his constituents his voting decision until the 11th hour and his refusal to acknowledge, until exposed, that he initiated two contradicting tax-cap legislation bills to the Assembly committee to appease both sides.

Mr. Latimer’s actions during this entire tax-cap debacle are extremely troubling in light of his statement on his May 29 WVOX radio program. During his discussion of the tax cap, Mr. Latimer described his parents as members of the working middle class who probably would not have been able to afford a home in New Rochelle or be able to pay the taxes! In New Rochelle, he often attends and schmoozes with many at our social celebrations, shaking our hands, nodding sympathetically and patting our backs. Yet here he is a month later, ignoring his roots and the concerns and the sense of powerlessness of these same groups. When we needed a champion to stand and deliver on this important issue of the tax cap, we got words, more words, non-commitment and finally betrayal!

Assemblyman Latimer disregarded his constituents and showed his true colors of political self-preservation and fear of the wrath of the New Rochelle mayor and the majority on City Council.

Frank Domizio
June 2005

My consistent support of New Rochelle’s tax-cap legislation is crystal clear. Equally clear is my contempt for spineless politicians who play both sides against the middle to posture for political gain. Assemblyman George Latimer’s political shenanigans of promoting contradictory legislation to both preserve and eliminate the tax cap have earned him the disdain of the majority of the New Rochelle constituents he represents.  Latimer’s priority of pandering to the Democratic council majority as opposed to representing the vast preponderance of constituents who elected him indicate effective reform in Albany is decades away if at all possible. Latimer never released his much-touted study whose “conclusions are inescapable for all except the most partisan of players.” I am admittedly partisan on this issue and I believe that Latimer’s report either never existed or Latimer could not justify eliminating legislation that produced a $7.4 million surplus. While Latimer may have guaranteed a no-primary campaign in 2006, his tax-cap trickery puts his re-election in question.

The only favorable consequence is Latimer’s future employment scope, which has been enhanced by his political nonsense. Latimer now qualifies for Ripley’s Believe It or Not and Guinness World Record for indecisiveness. Should Latimer decide not to run for re-election or be defeated, he can achieve gainful employment with Ringling Brothers Circus with is perfected fence-sitting performance.  Assemblyman George Latimer has redefined dysfunction as it relates to state government.

Anthony Gallette
June 2005

The Journal News  |  Ken Valenti

NEW ROCHELLE – The state legislature is considering bills that would end the unique cap limits how much New Rochelle can increase its tax rate, while allowing the city to continue collecting an extra penny of sales tax per dollar.

Sen. Suzi Oppenheimer, D-Mamaroneck, introduced a Senate bill that would end the cap on June 13.

“I certainly think it will pass withing the next week,” said Oppenheimer, who represents most of New Rochelle.  She said she “never thought it proper” to have the cap in place, arguing that local governments should be left to determine what services to offer and how much residents should pay for them.

Sen. Jeffrey Klein, however, said he would not support it.

“I would rather not see us remove the cap,” said the Bronx Democrat, who represents portions of the west and south sections of the city.  “I believe that property taxes in Westchester County, including New Rochelle, of course, are high.”

Klein said he would be willing to adjust the cap to exempt the costs of police and fire protection, in addition to exemptions added two years ago for increasing costs of the state employee retirement system.

The bills were introduced this month, allowing the city to continue collecting an extra-penny-per-dollar sales tax without the added limit on property tax rates. But the legislation comes with a mystery in the Assembly version; another bill essentially conflicts with it, calling for the cap to remain while allowing the Oppenheimer-added sales tax to continue.

The bills were both introduced on June 9, one after the other.  Both are listed as beign introduced by the Committee on Rules.  The Rules committee is chaired by Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver.  Silver’s office did not return calls yesterday.  The two Assembly members who represent New Rochelle – Deomcrats Amy Paulin and George Latimer – also did not return calls.

After years of asking Albany to remove the cap, Mayor Timothy Idoni was careful not to raise his expectations that the Legislature would finally comply.

“All I can say is, I hope so,” he said yesterday. “We have to get out of the prediction business when it comes to Albany.”

On Tuesday, the City Council voted 6-1 to call on Albany to lift the property tax cap while allowing the city to continue collecting the additional sales tax, which brought in $9 million last year. Councilman Michael Boyle, the lone Republican on the board and a supporter of the tax cap, voted against the measure.  He said he still finds strong support for the cap among residents.

“They feel it’s an excellent taxpayer protection,” he said.

In recent years, city officials have struggled with the cap, in one case coming close to shutting a fire house to cut costs.

The restriction was the idea of former Assemblyman Ronald Tocci, who continually insisted that the city agree to the restriction in exchange for his needed support for the extra sales tax.

Popular among many New Rochelle residents, the cap has been a political hot potato for some. Latimer, for instance, refused to take a position on the cap in his election campaign last year. He replaced Tocci, who did not run for re-election.

Boyle said he was curious about who sponsored the bills.

“It just doesn’t happen out of thin air,” he said. “I think it’s important for everybody to know exactly where everybody stands on this.”

Reach Ken Valenti at kvalenti@thejournalnews.com or 914-696-8255.

Tracking Legislation:

The bills concerning the sales tax and the tax cap can be found on the Web sites of the state Senate, www.senate.state.ny.us; and the state Assembly, http://assembly.state.ny.us. The Assembly bill numbers are A8768, which would continue the tax cap and A8769, which would end it. The Senate bill number is S5666.

AN ACT to amend the tax law, in relation to extending the authorization  of  the city of New Rochelle to impose an additional sales and compensating use tax…

Read the entire Bill here.